|
SEARCH -
CONTACT -
MEMBER AREA -
JOIN THE MCFA -
DISCUSSION FORUM
|
|
MCFA International mailing list archive
List subscription management - Mailing List Home - messages sorted by Date - Thread [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Administrative errors in MC actions
Dear Members, Last February I applied for an Oungoing-International Fellowship. Friday last week I discovered that my proposal was transfered to the Intra-European Fellowship without my knowledge and, consequently, without my consent. The research propoject was conceived and written specifically for the Outgoing action so the panel for the Intra-European fellowship could not have evaluated my proposal properly. I have told with Ms Campo by phone but I am still waiting for a fair answer. I have also sent an email to Ms Leflot that I have enclosed at the end of my message. I would like to know if anybody is in the same situation and what other type of actions should I follow to find out a solution to this intolerable administrative error. Thanks, Antonio Campos ---------------------------------------------------------- Dear Ms Leflot, my name is Antonio Campos and last February I applied for an Outgoing-International Fellowship (Call FP6-2002-Mobility-6 deadline 12/02/2004) for 36 months. The identification number of the proposal is 007764 and the acronim ENAGaT (PHY panel). The proposed outgoing phase consisted of a stay of 24 months at CERN, Switzerland, and a return phase of 12 months at the Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. CERN is an International organization dedicated to the study of elemnetary particles. Eventhought it is located in Geneve, Switzerland, this research center is fully elegible for the outgoing phase because it is considered an International European interest organization. This is very clearly explained in point 3.2 'What types of research organizations can take part?' page 10 of the handbook for the Outgoing-International Fellowships. Surprisingly, on 30/07/2004 I received by email an evaluation summary report of my proposal as if I was applying for an Intra-European Fellowship. I have told to Ms Campo and she simple says that the proposal was transfer. I have to state very clearly that this transfer was done without my knowledge. Of course, the PHY panel for the intra-European Fellowships has not consider my application to be elegible for funding for obvious reasons. The project was not written and designed for the this mobility action and, consequently, it could not have been evaluated with equanimity and fairness. I know, I could have applied for both actions, Outgoing-international and Intra-European, but because of the characteristics of my research project, my age and experience, my family status, and many other factors I concluded that an Outgoing fellowship was more suited for my proposal. Furthermore, I was several years ago granted with a Marie Curie fellowshhip in the FP5 and an Intra-European Fellowship would have not contributed to improve my research carrear plan. I do not understand what has really happen with my application? Why it was transfer to a different mobility action that the one I was applying for? If this has been an administrative error I personally find it intolerable. I think this is a very serious issue and I need a fair answer. I hope the Research Directorate takes inmediate action. Cordially, Antonio Campos
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Mailing List Home |